After the question of when to find treatment and vaccine for the coronovirus Covid-19 outbreak, was the virus most frequently asked by a human in a laboratory? It is the question. Although the answer is a clear “no” for scientists, it is still a very controversial subject for many septic people or conspiracy theorists.

In this article you will find discussions about whether the Covid-19 virus is a laboratory virus. You can make your own decision by examining the reasons and evidence of those who answered both "yes" and "no". But what is certain is that when you finish reading our article, you will find that the answers about the origin of the virus raise many more discussion questions.

There are persuasive foundations in the propositions of both answer fans. In addition to the solid evidence of those who say, “No, this virus came about through the natural evolution of nature,” conspiracy theorists who say, “Yes, this virus was made by humans in a laboratory,” offer many justifiable propositions.

Because for the future theorists, the answer is "yes", it means shaping the plans of the countries and lives only according to this fact.

The coronavirus (Covid-19), "made by man in the lab", means that it is just a bad first rehearsal for other major outbreaks in the future. On the other hand, there is also the evidence that those who say “No, this virus is the result of a natural mutation” also show that many viruses that are not harmful to humans in the past are likely to undergo mutations in one day.

So regardless of the answer, considering how the virus affects our today is a pure reality that we can no longer return to the days when the virus appeared. For this reason, our answers about the origin of the virus are more than just satisfying our magical curiosity, but also the answers of how our future will be.

What Does the World Think for the Origin of Coronavirus Covid-19?

When we evaluate the articles in the world with a curious examination, it is seen that a significant portion of the scientists have a common view that this coronavirus is formed by the completely natural mutation of the Covid-19. However, we should add that the good answers presented as evidence raise more good questions.

First of all, if we start with the opinions of those who say “No, this virus was born by nature as a result of natural selection”;

For example, from Scripps Research, immunology and microbiology expert Assoc. Kristian Andersen and her colleagues have begun analyzing spike-shaped proteins on their surface to find out the origin of the virus. They have presented and examined the genetic template for this section. Coronavirus Covid-19 uses these spikes to settle on the outer walls of the host cells to enter these cells. According to the analyzes, this "hook" portion has shown that it has developed to target a non-human cell-specific receptor called ACE2, which can be common in all vital creatures involved in blood pressure regulation.

But this mutation has been so effective for attaching to human cells that a devastating epidemic has emerged. The researchers reported that this virus would not be a produced virus, assuming that this targeting in the virus is not actually targeting the human cell. Researchers have said that it would be more appropriate to target a different human-specific protein than targeting a virus, such as ACE2, that will be created to radically affect human life. With this assumption, they reported that these spike proteins are the result of natural selection, not genetic engineering.

While reaching this result, they used the following method and explained the exact reason as follows;

As now known, even ordinary people, Covid-19 or earlier, SARS-CoV-2, is very closely related to the virus that caused acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) worldwide about 20 years ago. Scientists immediately analyzed how different SARS-CoV-2 was from SARS-CoV as soon as the outbreak occurred. The difference was found to consist of a few important letter changes in the genetic code. However, in experiments with computer simulations, they found that these new mutations in SARS-CoV-2 did not work very well to help the virus bind human cells. According to this assumption, if this virus is a design virus, it would be necessary to use computer models. At that time, malevolent scientists would not choose these mutations, which are predicted not to work in computer models. But unlike the computer, the virus chose these mutations and began to infect humans.

And if this result is considered true, nature has once again proved that it is much smarter than scientists. According to this research, the new coronavirus had found a better - and completely different - way of mutation than anything scientists could create to pass on new hosts.

Since there is a Suitable Origin Statement for Coronavirus Covid-19? Why Is The Debate?

Now, after reading this scientific explanation, it is obvious that he was born in many problems for ordinary people as well as the thoughts that made him feel comfortable. In other words, with the explanation, it is accepted that various virus mutations can be comfortably tested from the beginning. It is clear that saying that the computer would not choose it would not be a good way to relieve conspiracy theorists. For them, this explanation does not mean that the virus could never be human.

Scientists have made the following proposition to refute the "human hand production virus hypothesis". “If the intention was to hurt, why would virus manufacturers choose this type of virus to start with when there are much more dangerous viruses than coronoviruses? According to this assumption, "Malicious biogenetic engineers would try to convert much more dangerous viruses."

Obviously, in this assumption, skeptical ordinary people seem to have done no more than create more conspiracy theory in mind. This statement in the ear of the conspirators did not completely refute the hypothesis of “human-made virus production”, but it seemed to serve as a guide to malicious bio geneticists. According to them, if this is a produced virus, how can we know that the makers of this virus are not prepared to try the next version using this idea?

Scientists have explained how to propose a natural virus, not another human hand. They said that by looking at the origin of the virus, it can be proved if it is produced.

First of all, where did this virus come from? Scientific research groups have developed a possible scenario for the origin of SARS-CoV-2 in humans. According to the scenario, the starting stories of the last few coronaviruses that caused destruction in human populations were followed. According to previous similar examples, the virus is predicted to come from a bat but gain the ability to infect a human after passing to another host and mutating there. In this proposition, the status of the virus of the "Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS)", which is a similar virus family, has emerged. It has been proven in MERS virus that MERS virus used an intermediate host without infecting humans. Meanwhile, the host was “Camels”.

In the case of the SARS-CoV-2, the researchers assumed that the virus had jumped to another intermediate, possibly a "pangolin," as some scientists have said, after mutating there, after mutation. The first carrier of the virus is thought to be a bat again.

According to this possible scenario, if the virus had been produced, the genetic features of this new coronavirus that made it so effective in pathogenically infecting human cells would also be in place before jumping to humans. However, these pathogenic features evolve after the virus has passed from the animal host to humans.

Some coronaviruses originating from pangolins have a "hook structure" (this receptor binding domain) similar to that in SARS-CoV-2. In this way, a pangolin passed the virus directly or indirectly to a human host. It could even have other hidden features, such as the division region, which allows it to enter human cells easily. The researchers said that after the virus has developed this capacity, it can spread even faster among people.

In other words, researchers mean that all the features would be complete in a virus produced to harm humans under laboratory conditions. A procedure such as let it pass sometime to the host, develop mutation and harm human beings was never foreseen. Scientists agree that there is no technology to predict which mutation the virus will select.

First, let's put it in the bat, then mutation in tens of thousands of variations in a way to jump from human to virus pangolin, so that preparation could not be made.

But there is a solid deficit in this scenario for conspiracy theorists. The scenario also has to prove precisely that "this virus has passed from bat to pangoline, and from pangolin to human". If the evidence is complete, it can be said that the idea of "human hand-made virus" has not been destroyed but it has received a good blow.

The place of the epidemic; the most suitable place in the world for wonderful conspiracy theories; Wuhan

On the other hand, there is a good start for septicists to write exciting conspiracy theories for this coronovirus. The first and important reason for these “virus-made human virus” assumptions is due to the origin of the virus. There are very few bio-technology laboratories in the world that can research microorganisms. Fortunately, such a laboratory with level 4, the highest biosecurity standards, is located in Wuhan, where the virus spreads.

This is completely coincidence for scientists. But it's also a great resource for conspiracy theorists.

Conspiracy theorists also developed a counter argument when scientists said that this virus could not be a produced virus, that people who wanted to harm people would make a much more lethal virus. Accordingly, this virus is a virus that was accidentally removed from the laboratory.

In the updated scenario of this conspiracy assumption, the idea that animals such as pangolin used in laboratory experiments were somehow finished, and it was thought that it might have been sold to the wild animal market in Wuhan.

Moreover, the source of these rumors was the South China Morning Post, published on February 20. This news portal reported on the virus escaping from the laboratory in China. The source of the claim was based on Wuhan Virology Institute researcher Chen Quanjiao. Rumor has it that Chen Quanjiao claimed that Virology Institute President Wang Yany "sold experimental animals" to the live animal and seafood market where the virus spread.

But immediately behind him, Chen denied the allegations, saying that he was very angry that his name was used to produce false information. "The latest rumors about the Institute have profoundly influenced the researchers as they try to overcome important problems," Chen said in a statement. said.

In our article, we tried to bring together the hypothesis “produced by human hands” and the counter-hypotheses about the origin of the virus in the world. We can be convinced that scientific answers are much more prominent in these discussions, and for now the answer is "no this virus is not man made".

Will coronavirus conspirators stop? Probably not.

However, even if this is the answer, we have to admit that the coronavirus covid-19 epidemic has, unfortunately, also a very inspiring effect for countries or anarchist groups who would like to use bioterrorism as a weapon in the future.

Somewhere in the discussions, the conspirators also mentioned this fact. The prevention of coronavirus epidemics and vaccination studies are also open to the world with a desire to share a universal knowledge. The conspirators are asking the question that sounds logical;

“How can we ensure that the information published because these researches are very detailed and publicly available will not be used by a maniacal dictator or a group of mentally ill biologists obsessed with reducing the world's population?”

Moreover, they demonstrate with examples that bio-genetics technology in the world is much more advanced than people think.

For example, discussions that you know as GMO foods arise from adding insect genes to plants such as wheat or corn. In this way, drug-resistant plant species have been revealed. Or it may be a bit negligent to think whether malevolent scientists can combine 28-40 proteins in an environment where research can be done, such as giving birth to a child without sperm or human copying.

Again, conspiracy theorists also remind that virus mutation and RNA replacement research are not necessarily done with malicious intentions. For example, they say that there is already research on viruses called “Phase” that are everywhere but everywhere in the world.

These studies started with the possibility that antibiotics no longer work on bacteria. To mention briefly, "phases", "phases" are awesome bacterial killer viruses that balance the number of bacteria on the planet without harming human cells. Scientists want to program the “phases” to fight alongside humans in killing bacteria by researching phases. So the idea of producing human-specific viruses may have been born with good intentions.

ong to share the delusions of conspiracy theorists and say “yes, this virus is special production”. But it is clear that there are justifiable reasons to at least suspect that human beings have the technology to make such a virus.

And on top of that, human beings are known for their ability to create destruction on the world with the technology they have. With Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Cuba crisis and the Chernobyl disaster that took place recently, mankind has proved that he can use the technology he developed himself to be keen to kill himself again. Especially, according to the documents disclosed in the Chernobyl disaster, and even the evidence of the series, a much larger second explosion was prevented by making great sacrifices days after the first explosion of the disaster. If that explosion had taken place, probably neither we could write this article nor you could read it. Because a significant part of Europe and Asia will be literally "blown up".

In addition, the coronaviruses have waited for millions of years and, for some reason, started to cause illness in humans in the last twenty years, and the conspiracy theorists gave a good trump card.

Once you have been informed about these discussions, it is your appreciation that the “man-made” doubts for the new coronavirus Kovid-19 are completely empty.

So, What Will We Do After This Stage For Virus Outbreaks?

With the last coronavirus covid-19 outbreak, we will no longer be able to remember the fact that we live with viruses, whether produced in the nature on their own or in the laboratory, or by human hands. For this reason, making hygiene and staying the basis of our lives has become an unforgettable condition for survival. As Polser, we produce many useful patented products that affect the public health and which are useful worldwide. Polser AMB, antimicrobial surface is one of them. With Polser AMB, we have created a great innovative technology that works for killing 99.9% of all viruses using nanotechnology. Thanks to this discovery that can kill all microorganisms, including viruses, on the glass-reinforced plastic surfaces with a mechanical effect, we can create hygiene rooms and areas in all living spaces. Please visit "www.hijyenikpanel.com/en" to review our product.

We wish you healthy days.